Seth Meyers Shares
The Darker Side of US Foreign Policy: What Seth Meyers Reveals About Trump’s Venezuela Strategy
As the international community continues to grapple with the implications of the US attack on Venezuela, one question remains at the forefront of everyone’s minds: what drove President Donald Trump to take such drastic action
In a recent episode of Late Night with Seth Meyers, the host offered his take on the situation, shedding light on what he believes are the true motivations behind Trump’s Venezuela strategy
According to Meyers, the answer lies in the country’s vast oil reserves, and the broader lesson is a warning about how economic ambition can eclipse diplomatic restraint
Seth Meyers Shares: The Heart of the Matter
The US operation that resulted in the abduction of President Nicolás Maduro and a direct strike on Venezuelan soil left many observers scratching their heads
While the Trump administration has been tight‑lipped about the decision‑making process, Meyers argues that the motives are far less opaque than the official narrative suggests
He points to a montage of Trump and his supporters repeatedly emphasizing a desire to “take” Venezuela’s oil—a supercut that, in his view, serves as a candid confession of the real agenda
Seth Meyers Shares: Why I Think This Matters
What makes Meyers’ theory compelling is how it spotlights a troubling shift in US foreign policy: the prioritization of raw economic gain over diplomatic solutions and human rights considerations
When a superpower leverages its military might to secure oil, it not only undermines the principle of sovereign equality but also sets a dangerous precedent for future interventions
The episode forces us to ask whether the United States is moving from a self‑described “guardian of democracy” to a “guardian of profit
”
Looking Deeper
The ramifications of a resource‑driven intervention extend far beyond Venezuela’s borders If the US is willing to use force to lock down oil reserves, it raises unsettling questions about its commitments to international law, climate goals, and the stability of neighboring regions
Moreover, such actions can embolden other nations to pursue similar playbooks, potentially igniting a new wave of resource‑centric conflicts
The Other Side
Proponents of a hard‑line stance might argue that protecting American energy interests is a legitimate national security objective They could claim that a stable, oil‑rich Venezuela under a friendly regime would benefit global markets and U
S consumers However, this viewpoint often overlooks the long‑term costs: regional destabilization, erosion of US moral authority, and the risk of entangling the nation in protracted guerrilla warfare—outcomes that historically have proven far more expensive than any short‑term oil windfall
Final Thoughts
Seth Meyers’ satirical yet incisive commentary forces us to confront an uncomfortable truth: economic imperatives can—and sometimes do—trump ethical considerations in US foreign policy
As the situation in Venezuela continues to evolve, the public must demand transparency and hold leaders accountable for decisions that prioritize profit over people What will the next chapter look like if we let resource greed dictate our global actions
Source: Mashable.com